THE DECK CHAIRS have been rearranged, and we join the country, in the words of the Prime Minister’s political advisor Hartley Henry, in “commiserating with the Prime Minister for his inability to find the tools to do the job”. The fact that 67 per cent of the respondents in the NATION poll are in favour of the changes and the extent of the changes themselves bear testimony to our own observations that ten months into the job much of the Thompson Cabinet is still at sea and struggling to perform.
Indeed, if the present crop of ministers were paid on performance, most of them would be in the minus column. It is just as well that there is no formal probation period for the job. Lest you think this is a partisan view, it is an observation being made all across the country. Barbadians are now thoroughly disgusted with the blame game masquerading for Government business in Parliament on the sporadic occasions that the House meets. No matter how many coats of gloss are applied by the Government’s chief apologist, Peter Wickham, the people are wondering, to put it charitably, when the Government is going to get on with the job they elected them to do.
One victim of the Lowe-inspired reshuffle has made it clear that he intends to get done by January what was not done in ten months – specifically the Constituency Councils. Herein lies the problem.
No legislation governing the role or operations of the councils has been brought to Parliament, despite the fact that money has been voted for them. The new Minister of Constituency Empowerment, Chris Sinckler, when he is finished untangling the mess left by his predecessor at the Urban Commission, has a responsibility to ensure he acts within the four corners of the law by bringing down the legislation before he attempts to set up the six or more councils he promised within days of his new assignment.
The public is still concerned, and rightly so, about how they will be able to serve their communities. Will their peers elect them, or will the new minister handpick them? We have said before, and we reiterate once more, that in a country with such a proud record of adhering to the democratic process, we expect nothing less than our citizens being granted the right to elect those who will represent their interests.
There can be no double standards on this matter. There is a clear and present danger that the Government will use the councils as a tool to ensure its re-election, contrary to the best interest of the Barbadian public. Why else would the Prime Minister relocate his general secretary to this ministry?
And last but by no means least, we have heard the call from concerned citizens that to construct the councils on the basis of constituency delineations rather than by existing communities would be divisive and may well further polarise the country. They do not want a red and blue scenario in Barbados.
For the purpose of true community empowerment, it would be akin to the unnatural carving up of Africa by the colonial powers. Constituency boundaries, which serve a different purpose, cut across communities now. We can think of several such areas where two and sometimes three Members of Parliament serve what is essentially one community.
Councils based on community and not constituency empowerment will have the benefit of de-politicising large areas of urban Barbados in particular, which can only redound to the benefit of the country as we move into this new millennium with greater maturity.
So how about it, Mr Minister? Will you do the right thing for the country?