No one should be surprised about the queer happenings within the DLP under David Thompson. The most recent has been Thompson’s decision to reply to the Economic and Financial Policies (The Budget) delivered by Prime Minister Arthur on March 14th 2007.
The decision by Thompson to deliver the reply was indeed a serious slap in the face to Dr. Estwick and from his body language disappointment and dissatisfaction was most apparent. Thompson’s unilateral decision to steal the spot light from Estwick has sown even more seeds of disarray in the DLP camp.
Barbadians would recall that Dr. Estwick was Thompson’s appointee as Shadow Minister of Finance and it was his right to deliver the response to the budget. But Thompson, being his usual self allowed Estwick to do all the donkey work and then he just rides in and hugs the spot light. But this kind of behaviour is widely accepted as part of Thompson’s nature because he likes to indulge in the art of political deviousness. He enjoys showing off the dominance of his social class and enjoys it even more when he is humiliating persons the likes of Mascoll, Estwick, Stuart and others. However, no sympathy can be offered to Dr. Estwick for he was just in the wrong pew and no wonder he is now contemplating whether he is in the wrong church as well.
Dr. Estwick must be reminded that Clyde Mascoll found himself in the wrong pew and also in the wrong church and made the decision to uproot himself from Thompson’s surly Dems. Mascoll has shown that strength of character and resolve. For fear of being accuse of “follow pattern” Dr. Estwick has opted to accept the humiliation with the view that if by chance the DLP were to win the election he would make his move to replace Thompson. There is now a yawing cleft within the Dems which cannot be bridged.
But why did Thompson decide to reply to the Budget? In marketing terms Thompson wanted to improve his visibility Index or to put it another way, he wanted to extend his politically decaying shelf-life.
The recent poll has already demonstrated that Thompson has not gained any respect as a leader and hence has attempted at damage control so as to recoup his continuing lost ground.
In giving the reply, Thompson has gained nothing and his party has suffered even further. His proposals which were intended to back raise Prime Minister Owen Arthur’s presentation are so reckless that Barbadians are now even more resolve than before that the DLP is not ready to lead this country.
Thompson’s action is a manifestation of his dealings in earlier events when he and others attempted to rid Errol Barrow of the Presidency of the DLP. They charged then that Barrow was irrelevant for the times. Errol Barrow is now a National Hero and it could only have been out of sheer political expediency that Thompson would lead that March to the reopening of Independence Square. So Dr. Estwick, if Thompson can find you irrelevant, you are in good company with the Rt. Excellent.
Barbadians have now seen Thompson for what he truly is and has always been. He has considered the Rt. Excellent Errol Barrow as irrelevant and has now extended that thought to Dr. Eswtick and he will do it to many more of the Dems. His back-raising of the Prime Minister’s proposals with all the recklessness inherent in them is not for Barbados but the enhancement of himself. So let him be.

