SHOULD ATTORNEYS in Barbados, Grenada and their Caribbean neighbours who aspire to high political office be seen in court representing suspected drug kingpins?
That’s a question which people in the region are asking more and more these days as illegal drugs fuel the rise in crime and as some prominent attorneys, including well-known political figures, routinely appear in court defending drug lords.
Grenada’s Prime Minister Dr Keith Mitchell’s answer to this question is an emphatic: “No!”
“We have aspiring leaders who make it their duty to represent every drug person, every drug case in the country,” he told the DAILY NATION in an interview just after celebrating his 60th birthday at a gala at Astoria Manor in Queens, New York.
“Some of them live by representing drug lords. I have a difficulty with that.”
It isn’t that the prime minister was saying that accused drug dealers shouldn’t have the best legal minds at their side in court. Nor was he arguing that they shouldn’t be considered innocent until proven guilty.
Instead, what he was complaining about was a situation in which lawyers who wanted to be elected to parliament and ultimately become a country’s major decision-maker, such as a Cabinet minister, were earning a living by trying to prove that people suspected of peddling were innocent.
Lawyers who aspire to become prime minister, opposition leader, cabinet minister, backbencher in parliament or occupy any other high office should stay far away from major drug cases, he said.
His argument comes down to this: aspiring political leaders should not be seen by young people and other members of the public as being defenders of those charged with major drug crimes.
“While it is fair and true to say that a man is innocent until proven guilty and that everybody requires effective representation, my own view is that it is a wrong message to be sending to them,” he contended. “There are a lot of lawyers who are not running for political office, are not leading any political organisation or hope to lead any organisation. They are free to represent such persons as they see fit.
“But I think it is a seriously flawed message when people aspiring to be leaders and are likely to get into positions of authority in a country, be seen to be associated with so many drug lords and drug cases all over the place. I think it is sending a wrong message to the young people and I think we have some work to do there.”
But attorneys aren’t the only professionals who may be sending “the wrong signal” to young people, according to the prime minister.
He complained about the lyrics in some of the popular songs composed or sung by many Caribbean entertainers. Mitchell didn’t cite any particular song but he charged that there were hidden messages in some of the music that in his words “glorified” drugs.
“The music, I think there are some terrible messages in it. There is not enough level of responsibility . . . on the part of the artistes in the region. People sing and they don’t seem to realise the effects it is having on young minds.”
As a nation we do not want drug lords associated in any way with politics. They should not be funding candidates, they should not be assiting candidates and they should not be using their influence with the young people to get a particular candidate elected. Should any of this start to creep in to Barbados politics we will be in danger of “Government Capture” as put by the OAS. Once this occurs the country by extension could be held to the whim and fancy of these drug barons. Is this the type of Barbados that we want. We think not.
Who are the candidates in local politics who have strong working relationships with known drug Barons?