BARBADOS LABOUR PARTY

Entries from May 2006

Online Poll

May 31, 2006 · 2 Comments

There is currently a poll being done to ascertain the attitudes of the voting public in Barbados.

Please fill in this poll.Your responses will be held in strict confidence.

Just Click the link below.

http://www.makesurvey.net/cgi-bin/survey.dll/343C075BF9E043C1A38897BCC2545486

 

We believe this may be the first of its kind in the Caribbean and although not a scientific poll it would certainly give the pollsters some insight of the intent of the people. Maybe change the attitudes and opininons of some of the decision makers.

I hope my friends over at Barbados Free Press can help in getting this information out to the public so we can get a good response.

Categories: Uncategorized

US and British Media interested in our Blog

May 30, 2006 · 5 Comments

  "In my opinion, this is huge."

Today, Barbados Free Press received enquiries from two major media organizations – in the United Kingdom and the USA – who are apparently developing stories concerning the BLP Blog and the rising impact of blogging in Caribbean politics.

This was on the Barbados Free Press Blog. I wonder why they did not contact us directly. In any event it shows that certainly Blogging is taking off in the Caribbean. Wonder which media houses were interested.

This is truly a new medium to reach the people and also gives them a chance to respond and interact.

Thanks also to all those who comment on the Blog regularly. Please bear with us, we are still on the learning curve.   

Categories: Blogroll · Uncategorized

SEVEN YEARS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH

May 30, 2006 · 1 Comment

This is truly a cause for celebration especially for those persons working in construction, manufacturing, agriculture and the services industry. For the thousands of workers employed in these industries, the strong performance of the economy underwrites the security of their jobs and enhances the scope for expansion of the operations to create even more employment opportunities, higher incomes and social advancement.

Since 1994 this country has adopted the slogan "Job #1 is Jobs", and the score the results speak for themselves. Year after year, quarter after quarter, the relentless destruction of joblessness has brought renewed hope to all Barbadians. This is in direct contrast to the situation under the Dems when David Thompson this country’s youngest ever Finance Minister in response to the growing challenge of high unemployment offered the "earth shattering" solution of "bus-fare and lunch money". At that time the unemployment rate was almost 25%, threatening the old record of 27% that they set in 1973.

That the manufacturing sector is once again taken its rightful place among the contributors to GDP, is proof that the policies and programmes initiated by this BLP administration are working. The private and public sector linkages coupled with the capitalization of this sector has borne fruit and we know that its rebirth will continue.

Tourism continues to be the main sector of improvement, with long-staying visitors growing by 4.1 per cent. Our tourism planning and investment strategy in the Caricom market has yielded dividends with a huge 15.5 percent increase in that market. All other major markets recorded an increase.

The continuing rise in international oil prices has had a negative impact on the overall cost of energy resulting in an increase in the price of almost every conceivable good and service purchased by Barbadians. This led to the increase in our rate of inflation. However the current rate is already showing signs of decline having falling from 6.1 per cent to 5.9 per cent.

With unemployment expected to remain in single digits for some time, the overall economic picture for Barbados looks impressive. But this has not always been the case and Barbadians must never forget the dire straits in which this BLP administration found this country in 1994. At that time, there was abject despair and despondency the likes of which we had never seen before in this country. The social climate was hostile, our currency was being rejected in the region and investor’s confidence in the country was at an all time low. Uncompleted government projects dotted our landscape, an IMF employee had virtually taken over the office of the then Minister of Finance, David Thompson at Government Headquarters and a general malaise pervaded the offices of government.

We have come a long way since then thanks to the strong and enlightened leadership of Prime Minister Arthur and his team of able Ministers. With God’s help we will continue to keep this country strong.

Categories: Politics · Uncategorized

Hard Working

May 29, 2006 · 3 Comments

oarthur.jpg

Is this not a man who has worked hard for his country.

Taken on the OECD and others to protect and defend our way of life. In comparison to that other guy on the other side who got out when the things got too hot and then wormed his way back in after letting someone else take the heat for three years, only to then come back and drag the mat from under poor Clyde's feet. 

The question is will he disappear again after his party is beaten at the polls to leave some other poor sod to carry the banner for him until he deems it fit to return after being well and truly idle for three years.

We shall see. 

Categories: Uncategorized

BLP MPs are not Idle

May 29, 2006 · 2 Comments

OPPOSITION LEADER DAVID THOMPSON had the gall to call BLP parliamentarians "idle". This nonsensical statement would come back to haunt him a few days later when a debate on a very important bill, for which the required notice was served, had to be postponed because the DLP were not prepared for the debate. This is not the first time they were found wanting and, from all accounts, it will not be the last.

The view that the Dems are in total disarray is supported by solid empirical evidence. They continue to come to Parliament totally unprepared, expecting to seriously contribute to the debates, resulting in their having to resort to innuendoes, generalisations and empty rhetoric. We cannot recall any instances where their contributions were backed by either serious thought or reasoned analysis.

The people of Barbados deserve much better from the opposition DLP. During the last session, there were only two of them. They had the legitimate excuse that numbers were against them. The good people of Barbados responded by giving them seven seats. Sad to say, the more they increased the less they produced.

The fact of the matter is that Thompson misinterpreted the results of the last election to mean that the Dems were set to win the next poll. He therefore removed the leader and installed himself though he has no real interest in the job.

His only interest is to position himself to share out the "fatted calf". He therefore puts little or no effort in rectifying the disorganisation now crippling the Dems. They are a confused and leaderless lot, resulting in a case where every one of them believes they should be leading the party.

Naked ambition now masks the fact that all of them are patently unsuited for the job of leading either the party or the nation.

David Estwick was Deputy Opposition Leader up until a few months ago. He, from all reports, has taken umbrage with the fact that last week, when Thompson was away on his usual jaunt, Denis Kellman acted as leader. Estwick reacted by calling a Press conference to respond to the Central Bank's analysis of the local economy in an attempt to show up Kellman. But he went overboard to show how big an economic guru he had suddenly become.

Barbadians heard of an impending economic crisis about a devaluation of the local currency, and a debt crisis. It is a good thing that people do not take Estwick seriously, otherwise he would have caused a major panic in and outside of Barbados.

We will expect to see more of this confusion in the days ahead as the Dems seek to show up one another and grandstanding becomes the order of the day. The irony of the situation is that with all the goings on in the international economy, we need Parliament to be working at its best, seeking to devise ways of keeping the ship afloat. This BLP Government has done that.

After the 1986 elections, when the BLP captured only three seats, the nation could have relied on us to defend their interest. The "three blind mice" as the Dems derisively called them, worked assiduously and kept the Government on their toes, offering sensible and well thought out policies. They demonstrated how opposition politics can work.

Obviously the Dems are not made of the same stuff.

Categories: Politics · Uncategorized

Need to submit email address removed

May 29, 2006 · 4 Comments

We are constantly trying to improve our blog and make sure everything is grammatically correct. We have also removed the requirement of submitting an email address so as to encourage people to submit comments.

Keep the comments coming.

Categories: Uncategorized

Response to Critics of our Website

May 28, 2006 · 7 Comments

The Barbados Labour Party has been leading the way in embracing modern technology to reach the people of Barbados. Use of the technology including but not limited to Blogs and Websites is part of that focus. Sadly however this is largely left to very small teams working in harmony to then produce the necessary systems. I sincerely believe that all involved are trying their best with no other agenda hidden or otherwise and certainly no malice or otherwise destructive intent. The Barbados Free Press blog published a very critical article about our website and I have thus asked the producer of the site to respond. This is his response.

It has always amased me how people get caught up in minor details while avoiding the big picture. As Dr. Dugid noted, the site was not designed by the BLP, and while the pictures of Barbados were supplied by the party, the images in question in the banner were not. I am the individual who selected those photos, and I did it in keeping with the aims and objectives of the site and standard advertising practice. If there is someone out there who wishes to find someone to blame, then I am your target, not the BLP. There was no mandate or presure in any way from the BLP that influenced my selection, just the overriding fact that Barbados is a country whose inhabitants are primarily of African descent. The original poster notes that there are four images. The implication is that they are not just dark sknnied, but very dark skinned. I beg to differ. The lady on the right of the shot of the two women sitting at the bus stop is certainly lighter, as are the mother and daughter. Irrespective, there are four images. The same way that the poster has taken the time to find fault with the fact that there are no Asians, Caucasians or Indians, someone with a different set of perspectives would have objected had I chosen differently. To explain, if there were three photos of people of African descent, and one of Caucasian, then it is quite likely that someone would have accused the site, and by extension the party, of being pro-Caucasian, given that 25% of the images were devoted to a group that represents 5% of the population. Any further reduction of number of the original images would only exacerbate this argument. Likewise, one could, if one was so inclined, deduce from the images that the BLP is pro-dread, as I'm fairly sure 25% of the population is neither Rastafarian nor wear dreadlocks. In advertising (and the company I work for does quite a bit) much more thought goes in to the selection of skin tones than went into this site. Those decisions are based on the number of talent, the target islands and the type of product. If I was to apply the same cold methodology (which I did not intentionally, although one could argue that I did subconsciously), I think I would have arrived at a very similar selection of images. The client is a political party, and political parties are by their very nature designed to appeal to the majority. While this is in no way saying that there should be alienation of any minority, only those who choose to try and read between the lines to find such subterfuge would arrive at that conclusion, although the poster wishes to justify this by inference.People read what they want to read, and while I have no knowledge of the person making the original post, they certainly bring to their evaluation their own personal biases. If I am asked to change the images, I certainly will, but as previously noted, such a change could easily have the opposite effect. As noted by Dr. Duguid, I am of mixed descent although most assume that I am Caucasian, and the other individual who worked on the site is of Indian descent. Neither of us had any issues with the banner although my counterpart should feel more slighted than I. We were too busy looking at the big picture.

Categories: Politics · Uncategorized

May 21, 2006 · 1 Comment

 

Global Econ Data

  World Bank Development Data

  Global Links  

  IMF International Financial Statistics ( IFS )

 

  IMF World Economic Outlook ( WEO )

 

 

 

Year Barbados
GDP, current prices
US dollars | Billions
percent change
  1980   0.8840  
  1981   0.9730   10.1%
  1982   1.0170   4.5%
  1983   1.0790   6.1%
  1984   1.1760   9.0%
  1985   1.2310   4.7%
  1986   1.3520   9.8%
  1987   1.4880   10.1%
  1988   1.5830   6.4%
  1989   1.7520   10.7%
  1990   1.7570   0.3%
  1991   1.7330   -1.4%
  1992   1.6230   -6.3%
  1993   1.6900   4.1%
  1994   1.7430   3.1%
  1995   1.8710   7.3%
  1996   1.9970   6.7%
  1997   2.2060   10.5%
  1998   2.3730   7.6%
  1999   2.4820   4.6%
  2000   2.5910   4.4%
  2001   2.5490   -1.6%
  2002   2.5910   1.6%
  2003   2.6980   4.1%
  2004   2.8350   5.1%
  2005   2.9640   4.6%
  2006   3.0900   4.3%

 

 

Categories: Uncategorized

Dr. ESTWICK WRONG AGAIN

May 21, 2006 · 10 Comments

     

                   I read with great interest in the April 22 edition of the Sun on Saturday certain statements attributed to my friend and parliamentary colleague Dr. David Estwick with respect to the Gross Domestic Product of Barbados and its relation to the National Debt when he is reported to have said “ the entire Public Sector Debt had reached  100 % of the GDP.” And thus the country was bankrupt.          This is absolutely false and could not be further from the truth and I will present the bare facts as they stand. As reported by Dr. Estwick the national debt is $4.0 billion dollars in 2006 when the Gross Domestic Product is $ 6.2 billion dollars. This represented as a percentage is (4.0/6.2) x 100 or 64.5 % . These are the statistics as reported by World Bank Development data and the Central Bank.   Let us however compare this to 1994 when the DLP last formed the government of our beloved country at that time the National debt was $ 2.5 billion and the GDP was $3.48 billion. This represented as a percentage is (2.5/3.48) x 100 or 72 %. Some 7 percentage points closer then in 1994 to this Bankruptcy figure of 100%  than we are today. It is obvious that we were much closer to his interpretation of Bankruptcy then, than we are now.I could not allow this blatant attempt to mislead the Barbadian public go unanswered with such reckless and indecent use of inaccurate statistics.The IMF article iv consultation 2005 illustrates the point very clearly showing the present Central government debt in 2004 to be way below what it was in 1994 and at its best in 1998 again under thus present administration. Another interesting fact also emerges from the statistics which not only shows that we were closer to his definition of bankruptcy but also that the DLP presided over the greatest decrease in GDP in the 26 year period when in 1992 we recorded a reduction of the GDP by 6.2 % and moved it into negative territory (-6.2%)    With respect to the unemployment figures in Barbados, again Dr. Estwick finds himself a stranger to the truth or indeed he proves to be quite economical with the truth as the Central Bank of Barbados Economical and Financial statistics show the Unemployment figures for the last quarter of 2005 to be 9.0 % , far removed from the highest ever recorded figure of unemployment then under a DLP administration of 24.3 % .In 1992 there were 20,396 claims made on the National insurance scheme for unemployment benefit in contrast to 2005 when there were just 12,031 claims. At a time when the total adult population had increased by 11,000 from 200,000 to 211,000 and the number of people employed jumped from 101,000 in 1992 to 132,000 people in 2005 or 31,000 more people employed and yet there were only 12,031 claims for unemployment benefit at the National Insurance Scheme.  Clearly the numbers reported by the
NIS are indisputable. The fact that the dollar value of the claims is higher is a positive for this administration and it is testimony to the fact that people are paid higher wages now so their cumulative benefits would be higherbut the reduction in claim numbers is irrefutable. This is not the time for lies and innuendo this is the time for finding practical solutions for the many problems that face small developing states like ours. Dr. Estwick is entitled to his own opinions but he is not entitled to his own facts.

Categories: Politics · Uncategorized

Unemployment figures falling

May 20, 2006 · Leave a Comment

Barbados economy is continuing to out perform all expectations with unemployment figures down to 8.1 % out stripping developed countries like France and Germany. Of course this improvement come the knowledge that crime continues to decline in Barbados.

No wonder so many people want to live here.

Can we blame them for wanting to live in paradise.

Categories: Uncategorized